Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

Harmonising fees

Sep 29, 2018, 17:16 PM
Slug : harmonising-fees
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 9, 2007, 08:14 AM
Article ID : 87771

David Burrows, Solicitor Advocate. The family proceedings costs regulations were amended as from 2 April 2007 by the Legal Aid in Family Proceedings (Amendment) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/742) (see Legislation below). The author argues that this was a somewhat naive attempt to reduce pressure on the higher tiers of the courts by treating magistrates and county courts as one and the same for family proceedings and encourage greater use of the magistrates' court. The author's view is that this scheme of producing one combined rate for proceedings in the county and magistrates' courts simply ends up being discriminatory and ineffective, pushing the less well-off, disproportionately women, towards the often slower and possibly lesser standards of justice in the magistrates' courts. It is argued that improvements to procedure would be a far more effective way of economising and improving the costs situation. For the full article see May [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from