Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Habitual residence of the child revisited: a trilogy of cases in the UK Supreme Court [2014] CFLQ 342

Sep 29, 2018, 22:34 PM
Slug : habitual-residence-of-the-child-revisited-a-trilogy-of-cases-in-the-uk-supreme-court-2014-cflq-342
Meta Title : Habitual residence of the child revisited: a trilogy of cases in the UK Supreme Court [2014] CFLQ 342
Meta Keywords : Habitual residence - child abduction - Hague Convention - Brussels II bis - child-centric
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 4, 2015, 05:37 AM
Article ID : 116748
Keywords: Habitual residence - child abduction - Hague Convention - Brussels II bis - child-centric

In a recent trilogy of cases, the UK Supreme Court has adopted a new child-centric model for determining the habitual residence of a child in international custody and abduction disputes. This case commentary examines these cases in detail and analyses the implications of the new approach generally and with specific reference to two questions in relation to which the Supreme Court was divided: the need for actual presence and the relevance of the child's own perceptions. In addition, the commentary considered a number of issues related to or arising from findings of habitual residence, which are highlighted by these cases. These include the possibility of siblings being separated where they do not share a common habitual residence and the need for independent representation of children in cases where there is a dispute as to habitual residence. The author concludes that, while the new approach to habitual residence indicates increasing recognition that the Hague Abduction Convention was designed to protect children who are independent actors with rights and interests distinct from those of their parents, a truly child-centric approach requires additional changes and in particular provision of separate representation for children in far more cases.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from