Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

IMMIGRATION/HUMAN RIGHTS: Gulijev v Lithuania (Case No 10425/03)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:12 PM
Slug : gulijev-v-lithuania-case-no-10425-03
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 23, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87461

(European Court of Human Rights; 16 December 2008)

After being granted a number of temporary residence permits, the Azerbaijani father was expelled from Lithuania on the basis that he posed a threat to national security and public order. During the deportation proceedings the court relied on a classified report, not disclosed to the father. The father's wife and children were Lithuanian citizens. The father complained that this decision had breached his right to respect for family life under Art 8.

The issue was whether there was a genuine threat justifying the interference with the family's Art 8 rights. There was no evidence that the father's stay in Lithuania had posed a threat beforehand. No objective material had been presented to the court to demonstrate that any good reasons for the decision existed, leading the court to find that there were no documents that would allow the court to conclude that the father posed such a threat. There had been a violation of Art 8.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from