Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

IMMIGRATION/HUMAN RIGHTS: Gulijev v Lithuania (Case No 10425/03)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:12 PM
Slug : gulijev-v-lithuania-case-no-10425-03
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 23, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87461

(European Court of Human Rights; 16 December 2008)

After being granted a number of temporary residence permits, the Azerbaijani father was expelled from Lithuania on the basis that he posed a threat to national security and public order. During the deportation proceedings the court relied on a classified report, not disclosed to the father. The father's wife and children were Lithuanian citizens. The father complained that this decision had breached his right to respect for family life under Art 8.

The issue was whether there was a genuine threat justifying the interference with the family's Art 8 rights. There was no evidence that the father's stay in Lithuania had posed a threat beforehand. No objective material had been presented to the court to demonstrate that any good reasons for the decision existed, leading the court to find that there were no documents that would allow the court to conclude that the father posed such a threat. There had been a violation of Art 8.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from