Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

Gray v Work [2015] EWHC 834 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:11 PM
Slug : gray-v-work-2015-ewhc-834-fam-6125a50d-bf14-4f1f-ae59-68bd2efb1f6b
Meta Title : Gray v Work [2015] EWHC 834 (Fam)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 29, 2015, 03:36 AM
Article ID : 109689
In financial remedy proceedings the judge concluded that fairness and application of the s 25 factors required an equal division of the matrimonial assets.



Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 834 (Fam)

Case No. FD13D02383

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Date: Friday, 6th March 2015

Before:

MR JUSTICE HOLMAN
(sitting throughout in public)

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

B E T W E E N :

MANDY C GRAY
Applicant

- and -

WILLIAM RANDALL WORK
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO.
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
One Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HR
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

MR T. BISHOP QC and MR M. BRADLEY (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) appeared on behalf of the applicant
MR C. HOWARD QC and MR R. CASTLE (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers) appeared on behalf of the respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

J U D G M E N T


Gray v Work [2015] EWHC 834 (Fam)
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Marriage and Divorce
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from