Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

Government does not accept committee’s recommendations on adult social care

Sep 29, 2018, 21:43 PM
Family Law, Government, Communities and Local Government Select Committee inquiry into adult social care, adult social care
The Government has published its response to the Communities and Local Government Select Committee inquiry into adult social care. The inquiry called for the Government to urgently review how social care is funded in the long term and address serious threats to social care provision.
Slug : government-does-not-accept-committee-s-recommendations-on-adult-social-care
Meta Title : Government does not accept committee’s recommendations on adult social care
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 12, 2017, 03:11 AM
Article ID : 116044

Family Justice Reformed (second edition: June 2017) contains detailed commentary on the Single Family Court and the Children and Families Act 2014, Pts 1 and 2 (which deal with family justice), including clear and comprehensive guidance on the underlying procedural regime and the rationale for the reforms.









The Government has published its response to the Communities and Local Government Select Committee inquiry into adult social care. The inquiry called for the Government to urgently review how social care is funded in the long term and address serious threats to social care provision. The Government will not take action on any of the report’s recommendations. However, it maintains that adult social care is a key priority for the Government and it is committed to the vision of improved ‘person-centred care’.
The Committee’s original report found inadequate funding was seriously affecting the quantity and quality of the adult social care provision, impacting on those receiving care, the NHS, care staff, carers and providers.

The report recommended:
  • all councils consider how to identify unmet social care need and to put arrangements in place;
  • Government provide extra funding to increase social care provision in order to relieve pressure on the NHS;
  • Government resolve the uncertainty over paying for sleep in shifts;
  • councils annually audit the services they commission to ensure people are receiving the care they need;
  • the status of care work be improved through better pay, terms and conditions; and
  • the Care Quality Commission (CQC) oversee the market shaping, commissioning and procurement activities of social care by councils.

Response

The Government did not accept any of the committee’s recommendations outright.

The report suggested that a standard process for assessing the costs of care, which takes into account local variations in wage rates, and setting fair prices that reflect costs, would help guide local authorities.

However, the Government argues that commissioning social care is a matter for local authorities who are best placed to understand the needs of local people and communities, and how best to meet them.

It also disagreed that the CQC’s remit be extended to include oversight of social care commissioning by councils or that councils be required to undertake annual auditing of the services they commission. It says the Department of Health (DoH) provides guidance to support local authorities understand the costs of care when agreeing fee rates with providers.

The Government added that the DoH has no plans to extend the remit of the CQC to include oversight of how local authorities agree prices with providers.

Finally, it disagreed with the recommendation that it should commission a wide-scale evaluation on the outcomes and cost effectiveness of the ‘Shared Lives’ scheme.

It believes there is already data available on the impact of the scheme, with 91% of 98 Shared Lives Plus services rated as good or outstanding by the CQC.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
worry
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from