Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles

Family provisions in the new U.S. tax code

Dec 3, 2018, 17:14 PM
Family provisions in the new U.S. tax code
Slug : family-provisions-in-the-new-u-s-tax-code
Meta Title : Family provisions in the new U.S. tax code
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 9, 2018, 02:22 AM
Article ID : 117466
The benefits of many provisions of the individual income tax code vary depending on a taxpayer’s family status. Similarly, tax rates and brackets vary by whether taxpayers are single, married, or filing under a different status. Qualifying requirements vary across these provisions, and some combine child-related benefits with work-related benefits. While these policies are designed to help taxpayers, they add unnecessary complexity to the tax code and thus are well suited for reform.

The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) made important changes to three of the primary family provisions in the tax code: the standard deduction, the personal exemption, and the child tax credit. However, further reforms could consolidate the various family-related credits into streamlined credits for children and for work and provide certainty to taxpayers by making the changes of the TCJA permanent.

This paper reviews six family-related tax provisions under current law, including how the TCJA reformed three of the primary family provisions, and examines the need for further reform.

Key Findings
  • The tax code contains several provisions which vary based on family composition and are designed for purposes such as offsetting the costs of having children or encouraging lower-income individuals to join the labor force.
  • Currently, family status affects at least six tax provisions: the child tax credit, the child and dependent care tax credit and exclusion for employer-sponsored child and dependent care benefits, the earned income tax credit, filing status, the standard deduction, and tax rates and brackets.
  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reformed three of the primary family provisions, by consolidating them into two expanded provisions, which simplified some parts of the individual income tax code.
  • The remaining provisions are still in need of reform. Many of the credits have different, and complex, qualification requirements, which leads to taxpayer confusion and problems with administrability.
  • Provisions that are related to work contain family status differentials, providing greater work incentives to workers with children than to workers without children, with no clear policy rationale.
  • Other family provisions contribute to marriage penalties or bonuses, resulting in different tax liability for couples than if they both were single.
  • The nonneutral treatment of different taxpayers, differences in qualifying requirements, and the overlap between some of the work and child benefits, present an opportunity for reforms that would simplify the process for taxpayers and better focus the intended incentives.
Read the entire paper HERE.
Categories :
  • Articles
  • News
Tags :
  • Family
Provider :
Product Bucket : Articles - Family Law
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from