Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Family Courts facing crisis?

Sep 29, 2018, 21:55 PM
The judiciary – ​in written evidence to the government about changes to public funding – warned that the rise in litigants in person is taking its toll on the court system.
Slug : family-courts-facing-crisis
Meta Title : Family Courts facing crisis?
Meta Keywords : family law, litigants in person, legal aid, single family court
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 11, 2014, 02:19 AM
Article ID : 106009

In our last blog we asked if the new Single Family Court will cope with the surge in the number of parents representing themselves at court.

Since then the judiciary – in written evidence to the government about changes to public funding – warned that the rise in litigants in person is taking its toll on the court system. In its report to government, the judiciary stated: 'in private law family cases, legal representatives are now described by judges as “a rarity”'.

The report added: 'In the family courts the judicial perception is that private law appointments where both sides are unrepresented typically take in the region of 50% longer'.

I wonder if the judges had access to the following court data secured via the freedom of information act? It shows that since changes to public funding – when the bulk of legal aid was removed from family lawyers – parents without lawyers are now the de facto majority of litigants at child-related court proceedings.

Away from child-related proceedings, family court data for Ancillary Relief cases shows legal representation holding steady compared to pre-LASPO. It will be interesting to see whether data for 2014 shows a similar tend towards self-representation. This could prove far more incendiary for the MoJ given the image of stay-at-home-mums asking despairing judges what 'pension splitting' means.


This article was originally published on the Lawyer-Supported Mediation website and has been reproduced here with permission of the copyright owner.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
magnifying_glass
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from