Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

FACT-FINDING HEARING/APPEAL: Re A-C [2013] EWCA Civ 1321

Sep 29, 2018, 18:53 PM
Slug : fact-finding-hearing-appeal-re-a-c-2013-ewca-civ-1321
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 22, 2013, 04:00 AM
Article ID : 104063

(Court of Appeal, Patten, McFarlane, Floyd LJJ, 4 September 2013)

The parents' first child died at an early age of natural causes but had been found to have suffered multiple rib fractures.

When the second child was born a fact-finding hearing took place and the judge found the father to have perpetrated the non-accidental injuries against the first child. She also found that the grandmother had coerced the mother into concealing the history of domestic violence. Findings were made as to domestic violence by both the mother and the father during the relationship.

The father and paternal grandmother, opposed by the local authority and the mother, appealed that finding.

The Court of Appeal found that although the evidence was sufficient to support a finding against the father, the same could be said in the case of the mother. There was insufficient evidence to support a positive finding that the father was the sole perpetrator and that conclusion could not stand. Both parents would be left in the pool of potential perpetrators.

As a result of that decision the finding that the grandmother knew the father was the sole perpetrator could not stand and would be set aside. However, the judge was fully entitled to find that the grandmother had not been truthful in her evidence and that she had advised the mother to not disclose the domestic violence history and those findings would stand.

The father's appeal was allowed and the grandmother's appeal allowed in part. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from