Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

FACT-FINDING HEARING/APPEAL: Re A-C [2013] EWCA Civ 1321

Sep 29, 2018, 18:53 PM
Slug : fact-finding-hearing-appeal-re-a-c-2013-ewca-civ-1321
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 22, 2013, 04:00 AM
Article ID : 104063

(Court of Appeal, Patten, McFarlane, Floyd LJJ, 4 September 2013)

The parents' first child died at an early age of natural causes but had been found to have suffered multiple rib fractures.

When the second child was born a fact-finding hearing took place and the judge found the father to have perpetrated the non-accidental injuries against the first child. She also found that the grandmother had coerced the mother into concealing the history of domestic violence. Findings were made as to domestic violence by both the mother and the father during the relationship.

The father and paternal grandmother, opposed by the local authority and the mother, appealed that finding.

The Court of Appeal found that although the evidence was sufficient to support a finding against the father, the same could be said in the case of the mother. There was insufficient evidence to support a positive finding that the father was the sole perpetrator and that conclusion could not stand. Both parents would be left in the pool of potential perpetrators.

As a result of that decision the finding that the grandmother knew the father was the sole perpetrator could not stand and would be set aside. However, the judge was fully entitled to find that the grandmother had not been truthful in her evidence and that she had advised the mother to not disclose the domestic violence history and those findings would stand.

The father's appeal was allowed and the grandmother's appeal allowed in part. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from