Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Experts Costs in Public Law Children Act Cases

Sep 29, 2018, 17:35 PM
Title : Experts Costs in Public Law Children Act Cases
Slug : experts-costs-in-public-law-children-act-cases
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Oct 10, 2005, 10:41 AM
Article ID : 88511

Noel Arnold, Trainee Solicitor, Fisher Meredith. Costs relating to the instruction of experts within public law Children Act cases have become a hot topic since the decision of Ryder J in London Borough of Lambeth v S, C, V and J (By His Guardian); Legal Services Commission Intervening [2005] EWHC 776 Fam, [2005] FLR (forthcoming), in May this year and the Legal Services Commission's reaction to it. Noel Arnold looks at the arguments and gives some pointers to solicitors who have to justify to the LSC that they acted in accordance with the Funding Code. See October [2005] Fam Law 800 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from