Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Every Family Matters and the HFE Act 2008

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : every-family-matters-and-the-hfe-act-2008
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 6, 2009, 10:51 AM
Article ID : 85853

Brenda Almond, Emeritus Professor of Moral and Social Philosophy of the University of Hull, former Member of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and of the Human Genetics Commission

Most of the discussion about Every Family Matters, the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) review of family law, has focused on marriage and divorce but the Review included important recommendations beyond this area, some of them relating to new legislation included in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill received Royal Assent on 13 November 2008 after a year of scrutiny and debate in Parliament. The Family Law Review group contributed to that debate with a Report for the CSJ as the Bill was going through this appraisal process (Fathers not Included: a response to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (18/05/2008)).

Family lawyers may be unaware of how directly the new legislation affects their central concern: the family. It embodies fundamental changes to the meaning of central aspects of family and parenthood, motherhood as well as fatherhood. Little attention, however, was given to the risks involved in changing the legal framework surrounding parentage to allow parental status to be recognised on the sole basis of adults' intentions. The Review therefore recommended revisiting some of the unresolved confusions introduced by the new Act, in particular those that affect our understanding of motherhood and also downgrade the importance of fatherhood. A main aim of this reappraisal would be to ensure that the interests of adults are not elevated above those of children in a way that not only has profound implications for society but is also sharply at odds with other aspects of government policy.

To read the rest of this article, see November [2009] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from