Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Estrada v Al-Juffali [2016] EWHC 213 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:50 PM
Financial remedies – Part III, Matrimonial and the Family Proceedings Act 1984 – Diplomatic immunity
The High Court has refuted a Saudi businessman’s attempts to invoke diplomatic immunity to defeat his former wife’s financial claims.
Slug : estrada-v-al-juffali-2016-ewhc-213-fam
Meta Title : Estrada v Al-Juffali [2016] EWHC 213 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Part III, Matrimonial and the Family Proceedings Act 1984 – Diplomatic immunity
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 9, 2016, 10:04 AM
Article ID : 111559

(Family Division, Hayden J, 8 February 2016)

Financial remedies – Part III, Matrimonial and the Family Proceedings Act 1984 – Diplomatic immunity

The High Court has refuted a Saudi businessman’s attempts to invoke diplomatic immunity to defeat his former wife’s financial claims.


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: FD14F00410

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 213 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION


Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 08/02/2016
Before :


MR JUSTICE HAYDEN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

Christina Lynn Estrada 
Applicant

- and -

Walid Bin Ahmed Abdallah Al-Juffali
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr. Charles Howard QC , Mr. Tim Owen QC, Mr. Deepak Nagpal and Mr. Tom Hickman (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers Solicitors) for the Applicant
Mr. Martin Pointer QC, Mr Martin Chamberlain QC and Mr Nicholas Wilkinson (instructed by Mishcon de Reya LLP) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 18th, 19th, 20th, 21st and 22nd January 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from