Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Estrada v Al-Juffali [2016] EWHC 213 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:50 PM
Financial remedies – Part III, Matrimonial and the Family Proceedings Act 1984 – Diplomatic immunity
The High Court has refuted a Saudi businessman’s attempts to invoke diplomatic immunity to defeat his former wife’s financial claims.
Slug : estrada-v-al-juffali-2016-ewhc-213-fam
Meta Title : Estrada v Al-Juffali [2016] EWHC 213 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Part III, Matrimonial and the Family Proceedings Act 1984 – Diplomatic immunity
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 9, 2016, 10:04 AM
Article ID : 111559

(Family Division, Hayden J, 8 February 2016)

Financial remedies – Part III, Matrimonial and the Family Proceedings Act 1984 – Diplomatic immunity

The High Court has refuted a Saudi businessman’s attempts to invoke diplomatic immunity to defeat his former wife’s financial claims.


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: FD14F00410

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 213 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION


Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 08/02/2016
Before :


MR JUSTICE HAYDEN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

Christina Lynn Estrada 
Applicant

- and -

Walid Bin Ahmed Abdallah Al-Juffali
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr. Charles Howard QC , Mr. Tim Owen QC, Mr. Deepak Nagpal and Mr. Tom Hickman (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers Solicitors) for the Applicant
Mr. Martin Pointer QC, Mr Martin Chamberlain QC and Mr Nicholas Wilkinson (instructed by Mishcon de Reya LLP) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 18th, 19th, 20th, 21st and 22nd January 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from