Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Emonet v Switzerland

Sep 29, 2018, 17:16 PM
Slug : emonet-v-switzerland
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 13, 2007, 10:15 AM
Article ID : 87793

(European Court of Human Rights; 13 December 2007)

The mother and child were living with the mother's long-term cohabitant in Switzerland. The father had died; the child, who was severely disabled regarded the mother's cohabitant as her father. The mother, her cohabitant and the child agreed that the cohabitant should adopt the child. Only after the adoption order had been made did the family discover that the order had the effect of terminating the mother's parental tie, and that the child was required to take her adoptive father's name. The mother and child objected, but the Swiss courts refused to restore the mother's parental tie, as previously existing parental ties had to be severed on adoption unless the natural parent was the spouse of the adoptive parent. The family also applied unsuccessfully to have the adoption order set aside.

There had been a breach of the applicants' human rights. Respect for family life required that both biological and social realities be taken into account so as to avoid such unforeseen legal results. The Swiss authorities' failure to take these realities into account had flown in the face of the wishes of the individuals concerned, without actually benefiting anyone. It was not for the national authorities to take the place of those concerned in reaching a decision as to the form of communal life they wished to adopt. The applicants could not be reproached for having been unaware of the extent of the consequences of their request for adoption.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from