Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

DIVORCE: Duhur-Johnson v Duhur Johnson (Attorney-General Intervening)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:16 PM
Slug : duhur-johnson-v-duhur-johnson-attorney-general-intervening
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 3, 2005, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 87865

(3 May 2005; Jeremy Richardson QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge; Family Division) [2005] 2 FLR 1042

The Family Law Act 1986, s 51(3) provided that the validity of an overseas divorce could be refused if reasonable steps had not been taken for giving notice of the proceedings to a party to the marriage. The husband had not taken reasonable steps to give notice of the Nigerian divorce proceedings to the wife. He knew that the wife was in London, and although he may not have known precisely where, he had had no problems in contacting her when it suited him to do so. By the husband's failure to inform either his Nigerian lawyers or the Nigerian court about the likelihood of the wife being in England, the Nigerian court had been misled in a very material way. Therefore the validity of the Nigerian divorce would not be recognised by the English court, which would pronounce a decree nisi on the wife's English divorce petition.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from