Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

IMMIGRATION: DL (DRC) v Entry Clearance Officer, Pretoria; ZN (Afghanistan) v Entry Clearance Officer, Karachi [2008] EWCA Civ 1420

Sep 29, 2018, 17:12 PM
Slug : dl-drc-v-entry-clearance-officer-pretoria-zn-afghanistan-v-entry-clearance-officer-karachi-2008-ewca-civ-1420
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 23, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87455

(Court of Appeal; Laws, Rix and Wilson LJJ; 18 December 2008)

A person who had been recognised as a refugee in England, but who had subsequently been granted British citizenship, ceased to be a refugee, and the family reunion policy applicable to recognised refugees did not apply to such a person. The ordinary immigration rules for family members of a British citizen applied to such a person instead. The requirement that such family members be accommodated and maintained in the UK without recourse to public funds was an inherent part of those rules.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from