Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

CONTEMPT: Button v Salama [2013] EWHC 2974 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:48 PM
Slug : contempt-button-v-salama-2013-ewhc-2974-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 15, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 103797

(Family Division, Roderic Wood J, 2 July 2013)

The British mother and Egyptian father took their 6-year-old child to Egypt for a holiday during which they had a disagreement which prompted the father to remove the child and place her with his family members in Egypt. The child had since remained in Egypt.

When the mother initiated proceedings to secure her return various orders were made including making the child a ward of court. The father had failed to return the child. In addition he was required to provide details of the child's current situation in Egypt and to permit the mother and child to have Skype contact. The father failed to comply and claimed his family members were refusing to co-operate and give him any information as to the child's whereabouts.

During evidence the father was found to be evasive and dishonest. His account that compliance with the orders was beyond his control was disbelieved by the judge. He was found to be capable of complying with the orders but refused to do so. He was in clear breach of the court orders.

The father had so far been in custody for 18 months but these breaches were treated as fresh contempts. The judge held it would not be disproportionate to sentence the father further on that basis. The appropriate sentence, given the father's appalling and continuing behaviour was four 6-month sentences, in respect of separate breaches, to run concurrently. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from