Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Contact and Child Support - Putting the Horse before the Cart

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : contact-and-child-support-putting-the-horse-before-the-cart
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 10, 2007, 10:36 AM
Article ID : 85353

Nick Wikeley, Professor of Law, University of Southampton. Payment of child support is often viewed by parents as a precondition for child contact. However, it is a longstanding legal principle that, notwithstanding the inevitable links between child contact and child support, these are separate issues. Contact must be decided and support is then worked out appropriately.

The difficult relationship between provision for child contact and liability for child support is not made easier by the Government's decision to delay the transfer of parents who are subject to the pre-3 March 2003 Child Support Agency (CSA) scheme to the new one. This article looks at the recent case of Re B (Contact: Child Support) [2006] EWCA Civ 1574 where the link between child contact and child support and the difficulties with the old CSA scheme were caught up in one factual situation. The article considers, amongst other things, whether the child support system contributes to the view that child contact and child support should be interlinked, despite the courts continued emphasis that they should not. What can and should be done to reform the child support system? Is it possible to legislate for a fair outcome for all families? In what ways can policy and legislative reform encourage shared parenting? For the full article see April [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from