Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

Cohabitation Rights Bill

Sep 29, 2018, 19:04 PM
Slug : cohabitation-rights-bill
Meta Title : Cohabitation Rights Bill
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 4, 2014, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 104925

Alexandra Bevir, Solicitor, Vardags

The Cohabitation Rights Bill received its first reading in October 2013. The Bill proposes a reform to the current rights of cohabitants, and has far reaching consequences. Not only does it seek to provide a cohesive legal definition of what a cohabitant is, it also proposes to allow an individual to apply for a financial order against his or her cohabitant. This article looks at how the law currently views this area and what the implications of the Bill would be if it were to become law. The article also delves into the disparity between pre-marriage cohabitation and post-divorce cohabitation in current case law. The Bill is divisive with those for and against cohabitation reform both feeling strongly. There is a strong paternalism versus autonomy argument with those against the reform feeling that one individual's rights against another ought not to be forced onto them. Others, supported by the Law Commission, feel adamant that reform is much needed to reduce the hardship that arises from relationships which breakdown leaving one party with very little recourse for their financial needs.

The full version of this article appears in the March 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from