Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re E (Wardship Order: Child in Voluntary Accommodation)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-re-e-wardship-order-child-in-voluntary-accommodation
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 29, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 101025

(Court of Appeal, Thorpe, Rimer, Baron LJJ, 22 November 2012)

The teenage child was in voluntary accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989. When the case came for final determination the judge could either grant a full care order, a wardship order or make no order at all. The judge was of the opinion that wardship had more to offer the child but considered that by virtue of s 100(2)(b) he did not have jurisdiction to do so. The judge made a final care order but granted the parents permission to appeal.

The appeal would be allowed. There was nothing in s 100 of the Act to prevent the court from making an order in warship where a child was being voluntarily accommodated. The care order was set aside and replaced with a wardship order.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from