Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Care proceedings – is there a better way? [2014] CFLQ 113

Sep 29, 2018, 21:55 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-is-there-a-better-way-2014-cflq-113
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 12, 2014, 07:33 AM
Article ID : 106053

Keywords: Care proceedings – alternative dispute resolution – family group conferences – mediation – family support

The Family Justice Review reported in 2011 on the increasing volume of care proceedings in England and Wales and consequent pressures on the family justice system. Its report includes consideration of a number of alternative processes to court proceedings relating to child protection. However, little progress has been made in evaluating the potential of these alternatives to improve outcomes for children and families, despite the Review’s positive recommendations that this be explored. Instead, reliance is being placed solely on legislative reforms that restrict the input of judges and lawyers. The article sets out the current policy context and considers each of the mechanisms the Review investigated, together with more recent developments in the family courts and some comparisons with other jurisdictions. It is argued that caution should be exercised when there is a risk that delegalisation is based on economic rather than child-centred motives. Even so, it is disappointing that opportunities identified in the Review for research and development of a wider range of more imaginative alternatives to traditional court proceedings appear to have been lost.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from