Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles


Sep 29, 2018, 17:20 PM
Slug : c-v-t-2009-ewhc
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 4, 2009, 09:09 AM
Article ID : 85927

(Family Division; Moylan J; 4 June 2009)

The husband and wife entered into a post-nuptial settlement following a separation. The family wealth had all been inherited by the wife, and the agreement provided that the assets, other than the overseas assets, would be held in the wife's sole name. Almost 15 years later it was discovered that the husband had been sexually assaulting the grandchildren, taking photographs of them, and both naming them as victims and posting photographs of them on the internet. He pleaded guilty to 17 offences and was sentenced to a minimum of 3 years imprisonment. The wife obtained a divorce and initiated ancillary relief proceedings, seeking to enforce the post-nuptial settlement under which the husband was to receive only his interest in the overseas property. The wife, aged 70, had £4.3 million in her name, the husband had about £108,000, and a significant inheritance prospect.

The husband had fully appreciated the consequences of the post-nuptial settlement, which he had agreed to after receiving legal advice, and there had been no subsequent change in circumstances that rendered the agreement manifestly unjust. Further, the husband's conduct had been the grossest breach of trust and he had been responsible for the destruction of the marriage. Finally, having regard to the origin of the wealth, the husband had made no positive contribution to the family's wealth. Either on the basis of the settlement, or as a matter of discretion under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25, no further financial provision was to be made for the husband.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from