Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles

BRUSSELS II REVISED, ART 15: Re PC, YC and KM [2013] EWHC 2336 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Slug : brussels-ii-revised-art-15-re-pc-yc-and-km-2013-ewhc-2336-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 7, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 103295

(Family Division, Baker J, 31 July 2013)

The mother originated from Venezuela where she gave birth to the two older children but when the father died while she was pregnant the family relocated to Spain. The mother commenced a relationship with a Scotsman and they eventually married and moved to Scotland. The mother claimed that after she became pregnant again her partner became violent. When they separated the mother was granted a residence order and permission to remove the children to Spain. She initially stayed in Scotland before travelling to London where the family was placed in temporary accommodation in a refuge. However, the mother returned to Scotland leaving the children in the care of someone at the refuge before they were taken into police protection and placed with foster carers.

The mother had supervised contact with the children but she had recently returned to Scotland and had not seen the children for 3 months. The local authority had concerns about her mental health. The father sought to care for his daughter while the mother applied under Art 15 of BIIR for a transfer of proceedings to the Scottish courts.

The orthodox view that BIIR did not apply to the determination of jurisdiction between the different units of the UK had recently been approved by the Court of Appeal in Re W-B (Family Jurisdiction: Appropriate Jurisdiction within the UK) [2012] EWCA Civ 592, [2013] 1 FLR 394.

While the wording of Art 66 of BIIR certainly left open the possibility that BIIR could be applied to jurisdictional disputes arising between the jurisdictions within the UK the approval of the Court of Appeal in Re W-B meant that Art 15 could not be used to transfer proceedings in this case.

In an appropriate case, where an English court was satisfied that the issue arising in care proceedings could and should be litigated in another part of the UK, it had the power, as part of its general case management powers, to stay the proceedings. In this case there were no grounds for staying or transferring the proceedings. Both the local authority and the children's guardian opposed any stay or transfer. There were at present no care proceedings in Scotland, and no suggestion that any local authority there was minded to start proceedings. The substance of the dispute between the mother and social services arose in England when the mother allegedly abandoned the children. 


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from