Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles

Brexit implications for family law analysed in panel discussion at European Parliament

Sep 29, 2018, 23:22 PM
Family Law, Brexit, children, European Union, Brexit and Family Law Group, Daniel Eames, David Hodson OBE, Rachael Kelsey, Tim Scott QC, cross-border divorce, child protection, Hague Conventions, reciprocal legal agreements
Four family law specialists took part in a panel discussion at the European Parliament yesterday to discuss the implications for family law of the UK leaving the EU.
Slug : brexit-implications-for-family-law-analysed-in-panel-discussion-at-european-parliament
Meta Title : Brexit implications for family law analysed in panel discussion at European Parliament
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : May 18, 2018, 10:20 AM
Article ID : 117162

Four family law experts took part in a panel discussion at the European Parliament yesterday to discuss the implications for family law of the UK leaving the EU.

Daniel Eames of Clarke Willmott, David Hodson OBE of IFLG, Rachael Kelsey of SKO Family Law Specialists and Tim Scott QC of 29 Bedford Row were invited by Catherine Bearder MEP and the UK Law Societies’ Joint Brussels Office to engage with MEPs and Permanent Representatives from the EU member states.

The discussion covered a range of issues, including the implications of Brexit for cross-border divorce and child protection cases, the need for the EU to engage with the relevant Hague Conventions in the future and the importance of maintaining reciprocal legal agreements after Brexit.

Speaking after the debate, Daniel Eames, who is chair of the international committee of Resolution, said:

‘This is a crucial issue for tens thousands of families in the UK, and the rest of the EU. Brexit is going to have a huge effect on family law, especially for those families where parents are of different EU nationalities.

Our concern is that family law will go unnoticed among all the talk of trade deals, immigration and internal party politics. It may not top the government’s priorities for Brexit, but the impact of inaction would be felt by families and their children for many years to come.

Without reciprocity there is going to be delay, uncertainty and greater legal costs for separating families across the EU. Therefore it is vital that the UK government and the EU set out very clearly their commitment to finding a way to achieve the continuation of the reciprocal arrangements and how they intend to do this.  At the moment, nothing has been done to address this situation.’

Commenting on the event, David Hodson said:

‘I want to increases awareness by national and EU law makers to the particular needs and issues of international families and their children. When it comes to Brexit and Family Law, there are many real difficulties and disadvantages in practice flowing from EU laws. But equally there are a number of benefits. The challenge is to retain reciprocal recognition and enforcement whilst not continuing to be subject to EU laws, policies, agendas and the European Court.’

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from