Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

BP v DP (Children: Habitual Residence) [2016] EWHC 633 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:36 PM
Abduction – Wrongful retention – Children placed with father due to mother’s ill health – Application for a return order to mother in Australia – Whether the children had become habitually resident in England and Wales
The mother’s application for a return order under the Hague Convention was dismissed on the basis that the children were habitually resident in England and Wales.
Slug : bp-v-dp-children-habitual-residence-2016-ewhc-633-fam
Meta Title : BP v DP (Children: Habitual Residence) [2016] EWHC 633 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Abduction – Wrongful retention – Children placed with father due to mother’s ill health – Application for a return order to mother in Australia – Whether the children had become habitually resident in England and Wales
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 4, 2016, 01:51 AM
Article ID : 115653
(Family Division, Roberts J, 21 March 2016)

Abduction – Wrongful retention – Children placed with father due to mother’s ill health – Application for a return order to mother in Australia – Whether the children had become habitually resident in England and Wales

The mother’s application for a return order under the Hague Convention was dismissed on the basis that the children were habitually resident in England and Wales.

Case No: FD15P00455
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 633 (Fam)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Date: 21/03/2016

Before :


MRS JUSTICE ROBERTS


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between :


BP
Applicant


- and -


DP
(Children: Habitual Residence)
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Miss Roshi Amiraftabi (instructed by Brethertons LLP) for the Applicant
Mr Edward Devereux (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the Respondent


Hearing dates: 22nd, 23rd and 24th February 2016


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BP v DP (Children - Habitual Residence) [2016] EWHC 633 (Fam)

Judgment
Categories :
  • Abduction
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from