Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles

Between unconditional acceptance and responsibility: should family ethics limit the scope of reproductive autonomy? [2009] CFLQ 309

Sep 29, 2018, 17:59 PM
Slug : between-unconditional-acceptance-and-responsibility-should-family-ethics-limit-the-scope-of-reproductive-autonomy-2009-cflq-309
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 26, 2011, 09:41 AM
Article ID : 96189

Reproductive technologies have an influence on the perception of the family and its structure. A particular issue is whether reproductive autonomy should include the right to influence the characteristics of the newborn. The paper investigates this question in two different aspects: first, when sex selection of the future child for social purposes is requested through preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), and second, when genetic testing is used for medical purposes to avoid the birth of a child with a disease or disability. I argue that the moral values of the family, with an emphasis on unconditional love and acceptance, should prevent the use of sex selection for social purposes. As for medical purposes, I argue that the moral responsibility of the prospective parents to the future child may influence the decision of whether to undergo termination of pregnancy or destruction of fertilised eggs. Ultimately, therefore, the moral values of the family should be considered when a decision for medical purposes is made.

‘To love this particular child is to love his disability as well.'

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from