Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

CARE: Berecova v Slovakia

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : berecova-v-slovakia
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 24, 2007, 11:11 AM
Article ID : 85389

(European Court of Human Rights; 24 April 2007)

The children were in the mother's custody until the court intervened on the basis of the mother's gross neglect of the children's education, together with suspicion of ill-treatment, and ordered that the children be placed temporarily in the father's custody. In the following month, the father being unable to care for the children, the children were placed in care by the authorities. Domestic law prevented a court review of the relevant decisions. The mother complained that the placement of the children in institutional care breached her rights under Art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

The domestic provisions which prevented a court review of the relevant administrative decisions were incompatible with the Slovak Constitution, which was the fundamental source of law; therefore the interference with the mother's family life had not been in accordance with law. There had accordingly been a breach of Art 8.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from