Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

B v L [2016] EWFC 67

Sep 29, 2018, 19:45 PM
Jurisdiction – Divorce – Pakistani nationals, habitually resident in England and Wales – Husband sought to challenge divorce
The husband’s application to dismiss the wife’s petition for divorce was refused.
Slug : b-v-l-2016-ewfc-67
Meta Title : B v L [2016] EWFC 67
Meta Keywords : Jurisdiction – Divorce – Pakistani nationals, habitually resident in England and Wales – Husband sought to challenge divorce
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 24, 2017, 04:04 AM
Article ID : 113834

(Family Court, Francis J, 20 October 2016)

Jurisdiction – Divorce – Pakistani nationals, habitually resident in England and Wales – Husband sought to challenge divorce

The husband’s application to dismiss the wife’s petition for divorce was refused.

The husband and wife were married in 1995. In 2016 the wife petitioned for divorce in England where both parties were habitually resident and, therefore, jurisdiction was founded pursuant to Art 3(1) of BIIA.

The husband, as a devout Muslim, had principled objections to divorce. He submitted that they were married according to Sharia law and that only Pakistan had jurisdiction to hear the divorce proceedings.

The court held that the English court undoubtedly had jurisdiction to hear the case and that the wife had been entirely within her rights to seek a divorce under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.

The husband further sought a ruling that the court should determine that the proper forum for the divorce was Pakistan pursuant to the forum non conveniens rules.

The husband’s application was dismissed. It was highly material that both parties lived and worked in England despite the fact that they held Pakistani passports and had the right to reside there. The majority of the assets, including their pensions were held within the jurisdiction of England and Wales.

There could be no doubt that the proper forum to hear the divorce was the English court.

The husband’s further challenge to set aside the certificate of entitlement to decree nisi was also rejected.


Case No NG16D00437

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWFC 67

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BIRMINGHAM
FAMILY DIVISION

Birmingham Civil Justice Centre
Priory Courts
Bull Street
Birmingham

20th October 2016


Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE FRANCIS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

B
(Applicant)

-v-

L
(Respondent)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Transcribed from an audio recording by
J L Harpham Limited
Official Court Reporters and Transcribers
55 Queen Street
Sheffield S1 2DX

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

APPEARANCES:

For the Applicant: MISS BOND
For the Respondent: MISS CHATTERJEE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


JUDGMENT

B v L [2016] EWFC 67.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Jurisdiction
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from