Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

B v L [2016] EWFC 67

Sep 29, 2018, 19:45 PM
Jurisdiction – Divorce – Pakistani nationals, habitually resident in England and Wales – Husband sought to challenge divorce
The husband’s application to dismiss the wife’s petition for divorce was refused.
Slug : b-v-l-2016-ewfc-67
Meta Title : B v L [2016] EWFC 67
Meta Keywords : Jurisdiction – Divorce – Pakistani nationals, habitually resident in England and Wales – Husband sought to challenge divorce
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 24, 2017, 04:04 AM
Article ID : 113834

(Family Court, Francis J, 20 October 2016)

Jurisdiction – Divorce – Pakistani nationals, habitually resident in England and Wales – Husband sought to challenge divorce

The husband’s application to dismiss the wife’s petition for divorce was refused.

The husband and wife were married in 1995. In 2016 the wife petitioned for divorce in England where both parties were habitually resident and, therefore, jurisdiction was founded pursuant to Art 3(1) of BIIA.

The husband, as a devout Muslim, had principled objections to divorce. He submitted that they were married according to Sharia law and that only Pakistan had jurisdiction to hear the divorce proceedings.

The court held that the English court undoubtedly had jurisdiction to hear the case and that the wife had been entirely within her rights to seek a divorce under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.

The husband further sought a ruling that the court should determine that the proper forum for the divorce was Pakistan pursuant to the forum non conveniens rules.

The husband’s application was dismissed. It was highly material that both parties lived and worked in England despite the fact that they held Pakistani passports and had the right to reside there. The majority of the assets, including their pensions were held within the jurisdiction of England and Wales.

There could be no doubt that the proper forum to hear the divorce was the English court.

The husband’s further challenge to set aside the certificate of entitlement to decree nisi was also rejected.


Case No NG16D00437

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWFC 67

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BIRMINGHAM
FAMILY DIVISION

Birmingham Civil Justice Centre
Priory Courts
Bull Street
Birmingham

20th October 2016


Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE FRANCIS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

B
(Applicant)

-v-

L
(Respondent)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Transcribed from an audio recording by
J L Harpham Limited
Official Court Reporters and Transcribers
55 Queen Street
Sheffield S1 2DX

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

APPEARANCES:

For the Applicant: MISS BOND
For the Respondent: MISS CHATTERJEE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


JUDGMENT

B v L [2016] EWFC 67.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Jurisdiction
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from