Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

AS v CPW [2020] EWHC 1238 (Fam)

Jun 5, 2020, 11:37 AM
Public law children – Summary return order – Child’s wishes
The Family Division refused the father's application for a summary inward return order in respect of his son.
Slug :
Meta Title : AS v CPW [2020] EWHC 1238 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Summary return order – Child’s wishes
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 4, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 18 May 2020)

Public law children – Summary return order – Child’s wishes

The Family Division refused the father's application for a summary inward return order in respect of his son.

 


 

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 

 


 

 

Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 1238 (Fam)

Case No: FD20P00072; FD20P00106; BR17F00367


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 18/05/2020

Before:

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

AS
Applicant

- and -

CPW
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mehvish Chaudhry (instructed by [a firm]) for the Applicant (father)
Kate Claxton (instructed by [a solicitor]) for the Respondent (mother)

Hearing dates: 11 & 12 May 2020

The hearing was entirely conducted remotely by Zoom

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.


 

Judgment: AS v CPW [2020] EWHC 1238 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from