Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Akhmedova v Akhmedova [2019] EWHC 1705 (Fam)

Jul 17, 2019, 13:45 PM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Enforcement of financial award – Breach of court order – Injunctive relief – Liechtenstein establishment.
The Family Division granted the wife’s application for injunctive relief against the Liechtenstein establishment.
Slug :
Meta Title : Akhmedova v Akhmedova [2019] EWHC 1705 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Enforcement of financial award – Breach of court order – Injunctive relief – Liechtenstein establishment.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 16, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Knowles J, 3 July 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Enforcement of financial award – Breach of court order – Injunctive relief – Liechtenstein establishment.

The Family Division granted the wife’s application for injunctive relief against the Liechtenstein establishment.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 1705 (Fam)

Case No: FD13D05340

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 03/07/2019

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES DBE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

TATIANA AKHMEDOVA
Applicant

- and -

(1) FARKHAD TEIMUR OGLY AKHMEDOV
(2) WOODBLADE LIMITED
(3) COTOR INVESTMENT SA
(4) QUBO 1 ESTABLISHMENT
(5) QUBO 2 ESTABLISHMENT
(6) STRAIGHT ESTABLISHMENT
(7) AVENGER ASSETS CORPORATION
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Tim Penny QC and Henry Clayton (instructed by PCB Litigation) for the Applicant.
The Respondents did not appear and were not represented

Hearing date: 26 March 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES DBE

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Akhmedova v Akhmendov & Ors (Injunctive Relief) [2019] EWHC 1705 (Fam)

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from