Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Re C (Adoption Proceedings: Change of Circumstances [2013] EWCA Civ 431

Sep 29, 2018, 21:05 PM
Slug : adoption-re-c-adoption-proceedings-change-of-circumstances-2013-ewca-civ-431
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 3, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 102363

(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby P, Arden, Aikens LJJ, 25 April 2013)

The child, now 5 years old, was removed from his mother's care just days after birth and placed in foster care. Final care and placement orders were made and he was placed with prospective adopters where he had since remained and the adopters applied for an adoption order.

When the appellant became aware of the adoption proceedings he applied for a DNA paternity test to find out if he was the child's father. When he was confirmed as the father he applied under Part 19 of the FPR 2010 to defend/oppose the adoption order. The mother's position was that she wished for the child to be placed with his natural father or with the paternal aunt as opposed to strangers.

The father's application was dismissed and the judge held that in all the circumstances the child required that the stability that had been obtained for him should not be threatened and that it was in his best interests to be adopted. The father sought permission to appeal but there was a delay in obtaining a transcript of the judgment and in the meantime an adoption order was granted.

The father's appeal was dismissed on the grounds that he had no relationship with the child who had been settled for over 2 years with the adopters. The court could not take the risk of disturbing that placement. The judgment was clear and demonstrated no error of law or approach.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from