Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION OR SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP: N v B & Ors [2013] EWHC 820 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Slug : adoption-or-special-guardianship-n-v-b-and-ors-2013-ewhc-820-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 8, 2013, 02:41 AM
Article ID : 103287

(Family Division, Theis J, 22 March 2013)

Following the murder of the mother by the father, the maternal grandmother had cared for the two children, now aged 9 and 3. The father pleaded guilty to the murder of the mother and the rape of the maternal aunt when she was 16. He received a prison sentence of 14 years but he could become eligible for home leave before then.

The grandmother had provided exemplary care for the children in very difficult circumstances and she now applied for an adoption order which was supported by the local authority and the children's guardian. The father agreed to a supervision order but not to an adoption order.

An important factor for consideration was how the family relationships would become skewed if an adoption order was granted with the consequence that the maternal grandmother would become the legal mother and the aunts and uncles the children also lived with would become their legal half siblings.

It was clear from the evidence that the father had not begun to accept responsibility for his crimes and had consistently put his own needs before those of the children. Concern was expressed by professionals that if the grandmother was forced to share parental responsibility with the father by operation of special guardianship order the father would use it to fulfil his own needs to the detriment of the children. The welfare needs of the children throughout their lives could only be met through an adoption order as opposed to a special guardianship order.

The father wished to have indirect contact provisions defined in an order but the grandmother was concerned that the father would see that as a green light for his future involvement in their lives. That course would be contrary to the children's future welfare and stability.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from