Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION OR SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP: N v B & Ors [2013] EWHC 820 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Slug : adoption-or-special-guardianship-n-v-b-and-ors-2013-ewhc-820-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 8, 2013, 02:41 AM
Article ID : 103287

(Family Division, Theis J, 22 March 2013)

Following the murder of the mother by the father, the maternal grandmother had cared for the two children, now aged 9 and 3. The father pleaded guilty to the murder of the mother and the rape of the maternal aunt when she was 16. He received a prison sentence of 14 years but he could become eligible for home leave before then.

The grandmother had provided exemplary care for the children in very difficult circumstances and she now applied for an adoption order which was supported by the local authority and the children's guardian. The father agreed to a supervision order but not to an adoption order.

An important factor for consideration was how the family relationships would become skewed if an adoption order was granted with the consequence that the maternal grandmother would become the legal mother and the aunts and uncles the children also lived with would become their legal half siblings.

It was clear from the evidence that the father had not begun to accept responsibility for his crimes and had consistently put his own needs before those of the children. Concern was expressed by professionals that if the grandmother was forced to share parental responsibility with the father by operation of special guardianship order the father would use it to fulfil his own needs to the detriment of the children. The welfare needs of the children throughout their lives could only be met through an adoption order as opposed to a special guardianship order.

The father wished to have indirect contact provisions defined in an order but the grandmother was concerned that the father would see that as a green light for his future involvement in their lives. That course would be contrary to the children's future welfare and stability.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from