Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION OR SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP: N v B & Ors [2013] EWHC 820 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Slug : adoption-or-special-guardianship-n-v-b-and-ors-2013-ewhc-820-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 8, 2013, 02:41 AM
Article ID : 103287

(Family Division, Theis J, 22 March 2013)

Following the murder of the mother by the father, the maternal grandmother had cared for the two children, now aged 9 and 3. The father pleaded guilty to the murder of the mother and the rape of the maternal aunt when she was 16. He received a prison sentence of 14 years but he could become eligible for home leave before then.

The grandmother had provided exemplary care for the children in very difficult circumstances and she now applied for an adoption order which was supported by the local authority and the children's guardian. The father agreed to a supervision order but not to an adoption order.

An important factor for consideration was how the family relationships would become skewed if an adoption order was granted with the consequence that the maternal grandmother would become the legal mother and the aunts and uncles the children also lived with would become their legal half siblings.

It was clear from the evidence that the father had not begun to accept responsibility for his crimes and had consistently put his own needs before those of the children. Concern was expressed by professionals that if the grandmother was forced to share parental responsibility with the father by operation of special guardianship order the father would use it to fulfil his own needs to the detriment of the children. The welfare needs of the children throughout their lives could only be met through an adoption order as opposed to a special guardianship order.

The father wished to have indirect contact provisions defined in an order but the grandmother was concerned that the father would see that as a green light for his future involvement in their lives. That course would be contrary to the children's future welfare and stability.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from