Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Access to and Reporting of Family Proceedings

Sep 29, 2018, 17:05 PM
Title : Access to and Reporting of Family Proceedings
Slug : access-to-and-reporting-of-family-proceedings
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Nov 22, 2005, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85635

Mr Justice Munby. This paper was given at Jordans Family Law Conference in London in October 2005 and considers the various restrictions that apply in cases involving children. The paper looks at the restrictions on access to family courts and on the reporting of family proceedings. The High Court has jurisdiction both to relax and to increase restrictions. A judge can authorise disclosure of what would otherwise be prohibited, or he can impose additional restrictions. That involves the exercise of discretion, the carrying out of a balancing exercise, where a number of often conflicting rights and interests have to be evaluated. The paper illustrates the kind of complexity to which the balancing exercise can sometimes give rise. Munby J says there is scope for the proposition that our present rules and practices pay too much regard to the arguments in favour of privacy and confidentiality and do not pay sufficient heed to the damage being done to public confidence in the system. See December [2005] Fam Law 945 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from