Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Summary of Family Procedure Rules 2010 changes

Sep 29, 2018, 21:30 PM
Slug : Rule-Changes-06042012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 10, 2012, 06:02 AM
Article ID : 98243

While you were enjoying your Easter break, some changes to the Family Procedure Rules 2010 came into force by virtue of the Family Procedure Amendment Rules 2012. So what new developments do you need to be aware of if you are making an application as of 6 April 2012?

Main changes

While there have been some minor wording changes to several of the rules, the main thing to note is the use of statements of truth rather than affidavits in matrimonial and civil partnership proceedings (the Affidavit in support of Petition is no longer an affidavit but verified by statement of truth). Likewise the Form E (and E1 and E2) should no longer be sworn but signed with a statement of truth.

Permission applications under Part III MFPA 1984 are excluded from the definition of financial remedy by rule 2.3(1).

Addition and removal of parties - a new rule 9.26B provides that the court can join or remove parties to financial remedy proceedings where it is desirable to do so.

A new rule 29.12 makes provision for access to and inspection of documents held by the court - essentially non-parties require the permission of the court.  

Forms

The form changes to note are:

  • C100 (the question about the outcome of mediation has been removed);
  • D8 the Petition (minor changes to Part 3 and Part 4)
  • D8N Nullity Petition
  • D80A-G Statements in support of Petition (formerly affidavits)
  • D13B the statement (formerly affidavit) to dispense with service of the petition
  • D84Application for decree nisi (wording change to reflect attaching of statement in support rather than affidavit)
  • D81Statement of Information for a consent order (clearer that each party must sign to confirm they have read the other's form)
  • Forms E, E1 and E2 (no longer sworn, and Form E is now named more clearly)
  • D50A, D50B, D50C, D50D, and D50G - change of form name

Practice Directions

PD5A now makes it clearer which forms to use in Part 18 Applications - D11 should be used in proceedings under parts 7, 8 and 9 and  C2 in part 12 proceedings. In any other case, use FP2.

PD33A provides a revised form of wording to be used on an undertaking for payment of money as follows:

"If you fail to pay any sum of money which you have promised the court that you will pay, a person entitled to enforce the undertaking may apply to the court for an order. You may be sent to prison if it is proved that you-

(a) have, or have had since the date of your undertaking, the means to pay the sum; and

(b) have refused or neglected, or are refusing or neglecting, to pay that sum".

PD36A now formally revokes the list of SIs that appear in that practice direction

There have also been minor changes to PDs: 2A, 6A, 7A, 7B, 9A, 12B, 14B and 27A.

The rules themselves can be found by clicking here.

And Practice Directions by clicking here.

 

 

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from