Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Fostering for Adoption: progress, an unjustifiable ‘fait accompli' or something in-between? Part 1

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Title : Fostering for Adoption: progress, an unjustifiable ‘fait accompli' or something in-between? Part 1
Slug : Nickols-FebFLJ2014-190
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jan 21, 2014, 01:50 AM
Article ID : 104519

Daniela Nickols, Solicitor, Mowbray Woodwards Solicitors:

If Fostering for Adoption (FfA) is to be a justifiable means of achieving permanency for children in care, it must strike a balance between the competing perspectives of the child, the biological and the prospective parents, whilst simultaneously prioritising the welfare of the child.  In order to determine its appropriateness an analysis of the risks and benefits is needed.  Regardless of this analysis however, for the policy to achieve its purported aims of: ‘more adoptions, more quickly', it must also be workable in practice. This article, will outline the draft provisions in the Children and Families Bill 2013 which specifically relate to FfA, comment upon some of the theoretical difficulties with legislation as drafted and reflect upon some of the complexities which may arise in practice. This analysis will provide a basis for evaluating the proposed legislation, including the range of circumstances where it might be used.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from