Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

Fostering for Adoption: progress, an unjustifiable ‘fait accompli' or something in-between? Part 1

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Nickols-FebFLJ2014-190
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 21, 2014, 01:50 AM
Article ID : 104519

Daniela Nickols, Solicitor, Mowbray Woodwards Solicitors:

If Fostering for Adoption (FfA) is to be a justifiable means of achieving permanency for children in care, it must strike a balance between the competing perspectives of the child, the biological and the prospective parents, whilst simultaneously prioritising the welfare of the child.  In order to determine its appropriateness an analysis of the risks and benefits is needed.  Regardless of this analysis however, for the policy to achieve its purported aims of: ‘more adoptions, more quickly', it must also be workable in practice. This article, will outline the draft provisions in the Children and Families Bill 2013 which specifically relate to FfA, comment upon some of the theoretical difficulties with legislation as drafted and reflect upon some of the complexities which may arise in practice. This analysis will provide a basis for evaluating the proposed legislation, including the range of circumstances where it might be used.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from