Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

The law relating to needs and spousal maintenance: one firm’s view

Sep 29, 2018, 21:00 PM
Slug : Marshall-MarchFLJ2013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 25, 2013, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 101679

Emily Marshall, PSL, London

Kelvin Henderson, Associate, Sheffield

Alison Hawes, Partner, Bristol

John Nicholson, Partner, London

On behalf of the family law team at Irwin Mitchell:

In financial remedy proceedings, statute requires the court to have regard to the party's 'financial needs', but does not define 'needs', nor tell us the extent to which a party should be required to meet the other party's needs after divorce.

In its recent Supplemental Consultation Paper on needs and spousal maintenance, the Law Commission commented that in the absence of a clear definition of 'needs', a family judge has as much guidance as a bus driver who is given instructions about how to drive and authority to decide whether to turn left or right, but not told where to go.

This article outlines the broad views of the family team at Irwin Mitchell on the issues raised by the Law Commission relating to needs and spousal maintenance.

Irwin Mitchell examines whether 'compensation for loss' or 'unravelling the merger over time' should be favoured as a theoretical basis for spousal support. Irwin Mitchell also considers whether the law should place time limits on support to encourage independence.

Most notably, Irwin Mitchell provides its comments on the most controversial of the Law Commission's suggestions - that English law could adopt a formula for the calculation of spousal maintenance.

The full version of this article appears in the March 2013 issue of Family Law

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from