Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Costs Orders in Financial Proceedings: The Holistic Approach
Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Jun 1, 2011, 13:19 PM
Article ID :95167
Solicitor, Collyer Bristow
With all the talk about the changes introduced by the new Family Procedure Rules 2010 it is easy to forget that there are elements of earlier rule changes which are still being worked out by the courts. In particular, it is only in the last year or so that case reports have been published in which costs orders have been made in accordance with r 2.71 of the 1991 Rules. As these rules have been translated almost verbatim into the new rules it is worth taking a look at how judges have gone about making those orders and whether they have done so in a manner consistent with the spirit of the ‘no order for costs' principle.
To read the rest of this article, see June  Family Law journal.
To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here