Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
Emotional harm and interim removal: how psychological thinking can support practice
Dr Ben Laskey ClinPsyD, AFBPS, Consultant Clinical Psychologist, The Psychology PartnershipGeorge Butler, Barrister at Law, 42 Bedford Row ChambersThe family courts are full of cases involving...
View all articles
Authors

The changing professional landscape

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Maclean-FebFLJ2014-177
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 20, 2014, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 104515

Mavis Maclean, University of Oxford:

The article argues that both lawyers, mediators and lawyer-mediators are facing difficult times following the reduction in scope of legal aid for family matters laid down in the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act which came into effect in April 2013.

We are seeing a move away from traditional regulated and accountable professional client care within the justice system to a range of itemised services offered directly to the public by a much wider range of providers. These services may offer help with legal process but there are also other products: dispute resolution for disputes, counselling for emotional or communication problems, education for those learning how to parent after separation. The old debate about the advantages and disadvantages of courts and lawyers in dealing with family matters compared with ADR is being overtaken by a more fundamental struggle between professional court and lawyer based justice and private ordering supported by the rapidly developing market in specific services, including internet services. Does this matter? Are we seeing wider choice with more stress for vulnerable parties, or more choice with better access to fair and informed outcomes?

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from