Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
View all articles
Authors

The changing professional landscape

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Maclean-FebFLJ2014-177
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 20, 2014, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 104515

Mavis Maclean, University of Oxford:

The article argues that both lawyers, mediators and lawyer-mediators are facing difficult times following the reduction in scope of legal aid for family matters laid down in the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act which came into effect in April 2013.

We are seeing a move away from traditional regulated and accountable professional client care within the justice system to a range of itemised services offered directly to the public by a much wider range of providers. These services may offer help with legal process but there are also other products: dispute resolution for disputes, counselling for emotional or communication problems, education for those learning how to parent after separation. The old debate about the advantages and disadvantages of courts and lawyers in dealing with family matters compared with ADR is being overtaken by a more fundamental struggle between professional court and lawyer based justice and private ordering supported by the rapidly developing market in specific services, including internet services. Does this matter? Are we seeing wider choice with more stress for vulnerable parties, or more choice with better access to fair and informed outcomes?

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from