Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

Defending Legal Aid

Sep 29, 2018, 17:31 PM
Slug : LegalAid060910
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 6, 2010, 10:00 AM
Article ID : 91361

Law SocietyThe Law Society succeeded in their application for an expedited hearing to dispute the Legal Services Commission's (LSC) conduct of the tendering process for family legal aid contracts. The High Court granted the application and the hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, 21 September 2010 with judgment expected to be handed down on Friday, 24 September.

Pending the hearing of the case, the court ordered that the new contracts should not be issued, though, the LSC's efforts on appeals and verification is set to continue. For the time being, the LSC has committed to extending civil legal aid contracts by one month.

The Law Society and LSC will meet today to reach an agreement concerning the practical issues regarding the contract extension. More information will be made available to the profession and details of the case will be accessible to affected firms.

For more information see The Law Society's ‘What Price Justice' campaign www.lawsociety.org.uk/defendinglegalaid

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from