Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Use of experts in legally aided cases

Sep 29, 2018, 18:38 PM
Slug : LSC-PG-Use-of-experts-in-legally-aided-cases-18012013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2013, 08:55 AM
Article ID : 101431

The LSC has published guidance on applications for prior authorities for experts in family cases.

The guidance comes as a result of work with representative bodies to assist providers in identifying when to submit an application for prior authority and when it is not necessary to do so.

The LSC's Standard Civil Contract states that there is a contractual right to seek or obtain prior authority only where the rate sought exceeds the codified rates introduced in October 2011, or where the item of costs is unusual in its nature or is unusually large.

The guidance includes:

  • examples of factors that may indicate that exceptional circumstances apply;
  • benchmarks of ‘unusual' hours below which prior authority should not be sought;
  • ranges of hours within which prior authority applications have typically been granted for psychologists and psychiatrists, which represent the most commonly used expert types;
  • details of the expert witness information required on detailed assessment.

The guidance also confirms that prior authority is not necessary in relation to drug and alcohol tests provided that the tests carried out reflect what has been directed in a Court Order.

The ‘typical' hours outlined in the guidance are not caps. They are intended to assist providers in assessing on a case by case basis when it would be appropriate to submit an application for prior authority. Prior authority itself is not a limit on the number of hours that may be undertaken by an expert. Additional expert work hours may be justified on assessment at the end of the case to the relevant assessing authority, which may be either the LSC or the Court.

Categories :
  • Legislation & Guidance
  • Practice Guidance
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from