Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

Use of experts in legally aided cases

Sep 29, 2018, 18:38 PM
Slug : LSC-PG-Use-of-experts-in-legally-aided-cases-18012013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2013, 08:55 AM
Article ID : 101431

The LSC has published guidance on applications for prior authorities for experts in family cases.

The guidance comes as a result of work with representative bodies to assist providers in identifying when to submit an application for prior authority and when it is not necessary to do so.

The LSC's Standard Civil Contract states that there is a contractual right to seek or obtain prior authority only where the rate sought exceeds the codified rates introduced in October 2011, or where the item of costs is unusual in its nature or is unusually large.

The guidance includes:

  • examples of factors that may indicate that exceptional circumstances apply;
  • benchmarks of ‘unusual' hours below which prior authority should not be sought;
  • ranges of hours within which prior authority applications have typically been granted for psychologists and psychiatrists, which represent the most commonly used expert types;
  • details of the expert witness information required on detailed assessment.

The guidance also confirms that prior authority is not necessary in relation to drug and alcohol tests provided that the tests carried out reflect what has been directed in a Court Order.

The ‘typical' hours outlined in the guidance are not caps. They are intended to assist providers in assessing on a case by case basis when it would be appropriate to submit an application for prior authority. Prior authority itself is not a limit on the number of hours that may be undertaken by an expert. Additional expert work hours may be justified on assessment at the end of the case to the relevant assessing authority, which may be either the LSC or the Court.

Categories :
  • Legislation & Guidance
  • Practice Guidance
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from