Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Jones v Jones: Springboards, Non-Matrimonial Property, Castles and Companies

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : KatharineLandells-AprilFLJ2011
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 1, 2011, 12:21 PM
Article ID : 95145

Katharine Landells

Solicitor, Withers LLP

In his article ‘A Judicial Safari tour of Ancillary Relief: J v J' published in October [2010] Fam Law 1111, Ashley Murray set himself the task of digesting and summarising Mr Justice Charles's judgment in the case of J v J [2009] EWHC 2654 (Fam), [2011] 1 FLR (forthcoming). What he described as the challenge of a lifetime was also the task that faced the Court of Appeal when they heard the case in November last year. Lord Justice Wilson's criticism of Charles J's judgment was less restrained than Mr Murray's when he described it as ‘far too long, too discursive and too unwieldy'. In characteristic voice, Wilson LJ went on to say that he refused to accept that modern principles of ancillary relief were as complex as the judgment given by Charles J would seem to imply.

The decision in Jones v Jones is an important one as far as the treatment of pre-marital or inherited assets is concerned. This article will discuss the decision of the Court of Appeal and examine the principles that can be extracted from it.

To read the rest of this article, see April [2011] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from