Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Judicial appointments: improving efficiency, transparency and diversity

Sep 29, 2018, 18:51 PM
Title : Judicial appointments: improving efficiency, transparency and diversity
Slug : Judicial-appointments-efficiency-transparency-diversity-301013-847
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Oct 30, 2013, 10:00 AM
Article ID : 103945

Regulations made under the Crime and Courts Act 2013 commencing in September and October 2013 will promote efficiency, transparency and diversity in judicial appointments, according to the Judicial Appointments Commission.

Key provisions of the recent legislation include the introduction of flexible working in the High Court and above. The aim is to enable judges to move more easily between working in the courts and tribunals.

New selection processes are also under discussion with a focus on transparency and the provision of opportunities for all eligible candidates to be objectively assessed. An ‘equal merit' provision will also feature, so that where two candidates are of equal merit, one can be chosen on the basis that their appointment improves diversity.

There are further provisions aimed at improving the diversity of selection panels and ensuring greater lay influence on the decisions to appoint the President of the Supreme Court and the Lord Chief Justice.

The Lord Chancellor will now focus on appointments to senior judicial posts. Powers to accept, reject or ask for recommendations for judicial appointments below the High Court have been transferred to the Lord Chief Justice or to the Senior President of Tribunals for tribunal appointments.

The changes arise out of the general duty under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to have regard to the need to encourage diversity in the range of persons available for selection, and additional duties imposed on public authorities under the Equality Act 2010.    

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from