Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Surrogacy, egg donation and assisted reproduction: payments and the conflict of law and policy

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Ghevaert-FebFLJ2014-215
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 22, 2014, 01:58 AM
Article ID : 104525

Louisa Ghevaert, Partner, Porter Dodson LLP

Ruth Cabeza, Barrister, Field Court Chambers

Re C [2013] EWHC 2408 (Fam) concerned a commercial US (Californian) surrogacy arrangement and a subsequent parental order application by British intended parents. The case represents a sophisticated response to evolving and conflicting cross-border law and policy and strikes a careful balance between the interests of intended parents, the surrogate, the child, the surrogacy agency, the clinician and the egg donor.In this case, the English court redefined and clarified its approach to international surrogacy, egg donation and assisted reproduction.  The court made clear that it will robustly scrutinise and investigate all aspects of the surrogacy arrangement to ensure there has been no abuse of public policy and it highlights the importance of transparency and detailed disclosure.

Re C marks the authorization by the English court of one of the highest amounts ever paid to a surrogate mother. The court carefully revisited the parameters for retrospectively authorizing all payments made within the context of the surrogacy arrangement having regard to s 54(8) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 in view of the UK public policy restriction against commercial surrogacy. In doing so, the court for the first time married jurisprudence between egg donation and surrogacy law and policy in the UK.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from