Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

Surrogacy, egg donation and assisted reproduction: payments and the conflict of law and policy

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Ghevaert-FebFLJ2014-215
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 22, 2014, 01:58 AM
Article ID : 104525

Louisa Ghevaert, Partner, Porter Dodson LLP

Ruth Cabeza, Barrister, Field Court Chambers

Re C [2013] EWHC 2408 (Fam) concerned a commercial US (Californian) surrogacy arrangement and a subsequent parental order application by British intended parents. The case represents a sophisticated response to evolving and conflicting cross-border law and policy and strikes a careful balance between the interests of intended parents, the surrogate, the child, the surrogacy agency, the clinician and the egg donor.In this case, the English court redefined and clarified its approach to international surrogacy, egg donation and assisted reproduction.  The court made clear that it will robustly scrutinise and investigate all aspects of the surrogacy arrangement to ensure there has been no abuse of public policy and it highlights the importance of transparency and detailed disclosure.

Re C marks the authorization by the English court of one of the highest amounts ever paid to a surrogate mother. The court carefully revisited the parameters for retrospectively authorizing all payments made within the context of the surrogacy arrangement having regard to s 54(8) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 in view of the UK public policy restriction against commercial surrogacy. In doing so, the court for the first time married jurisprudence between egg donation and surrogacy law and policy in the UK.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from