Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

Surrogacy, egg donation and assisted reproduction: payments and the conflict of law and policy

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Ghevaert-FebFLJ2014-215
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 22, 2014, 01:58 AM
Article ID : 104525

Louisa Ghevaert, Partner, Porter Dodson LLP

Ruth Cabeza, Barrister, Field Court Chambers

Re C [2013] EWHC 2408 (Fam) concerned a commercial US (Californian) surrogacy arrangement and a subsequent parental order application by British intended parents. The case represents a sophisticated response to evolving and conflicting cross-border law and policy and strikes a careful balance between the interests of intended parents, the surrogate, the child, the surrogacy agency, the clinician and the egg donor.In this case, the English court redefined and clarified its approach to international surrogacy, egg donation and assisted reproduction.  The court made clear that it will robustly scrutinise and investigate all aspects of the surrogacy arrangement to ensure there has been no abuse of public policy and it highlights the importance of transparency and detailed disclosure.

Re C marks the authorization by the English court of one of the highest amounts ever paid to a surrogate mother. The court carefully revisited the parameters for retrospectively authorizing all payments made within the context of the surrogacy arrangement having regard to s 54(8) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 in view of the UK public policy restriction against commercial surrogacy. In doing so, the court for the first time married jurisprudence between egg donation and surrogacy law and policy in the UK.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from