Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

WILLS: Charles, Goddard and Thompson v Fraser [2010] EWHC 2154 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : EWHC2154
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 27, 2010, 02:01 AM
Article ID : 92241

(Chancery Division; Mr Jonathan Gaunt QC sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division; 11 August 2010)

Two sisters' left estates to each other in their wills, with very detailed provisions as to beneficiaries to benefit on the death of the survivor, each sister allocating half of the remaining assets. There was no specific statement in the wills as to whether it could be revoked, or to negate creation of any constructive or implied trust. However, the very detailed terms of the wills made little sense if the survivor was able to revoke her will on the death of a sister. The surviving sister revoked her reciprocal will. She then made a will in similar terms, leaving the beneficiaries of her sister's ‘share' unaltered but removed one of her own beneficiaries, added two beneficiaries to replace dead beneficiaries and changed specific shares of certain of her ‘own' beneficiaries. Possibly unwittingly, these changes changed the value of shares of her sister's beneficiaries and subsequently, aged 92, the survivor left the entire estate to one friend.

Held that effect should be given to the original will. There was considerable evidence of an agreement between the sisters that gifts on the death of the survivor were not to be changed.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from