Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

WILLS: Charles, Goddard and Thompson v Fraser [2010] EWHC 2154 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : EWHC2154
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 27, 2010, 02:01 AM
Article ID : 92241

(Chancery Division; Mr Jonathan Gaunt QC sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division; 11 August 2010)

Two sisters' left estates to each other in their wills, with very detailed provisions as to beneficiaries to benefit on the death of the survivor, each sister allocating half of the remaining assets. There was no specific statement in the wills as to whether it could be revoked, or to negate creation of any constructive or implied trust. However, the very detailed terms of the wills made little sense if the survivor was able to revoke her will on the death of a sister. The surviving sister revoked her reciprocal will. She then made a will in similar terms, leaving the beneficiaries of her sister's ‘share' unaltered but removed one of her own beneficiaries, added two beneficiaries to replace dead beneficiaries and changed specific shares of certain of her ‘own' beneficiaries. Possibly unwittingly, these changes changed the value of shares of her sister's beneficiaries and subsequently, aged 92, the survivor left the entire estate to one friend.

Held that effect should be given to the original will. There was considerable evidence of an agreement between the sisters that gifts on the death of the survivor were not to be changed.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from