Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles

Adoption agencies turning parents away unnecessarily, charity warns

Sep 29, 2018, 17:39 PM
Slug : AdoptionUK24012011-654
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 24, 2011, 08:40 AM
Article ID : 93393

Child in darkA significant number of children in care are losing out because of long systematic delays in approving adoptive parents, according to an Adoption UK survey.

The survey of the charity's membership and website users, found that while many of those interested in adopting receive a good or reasonable response from adoption agencies, over a quarter were turned away.

Of the survey's 172 respondents, 27 percent were turned away. Sixteen percent of those who gave a reason for the rejection claimed the agency was not recruiting adopters. The figures come at a time when there are approximately 4,000 children in the UK care system waiting to be adopted.

Adoption UK Chief Executive, Jonathan Pearce, said: "While the majority of adopters going through the process to become adoptive parents are experiencing good practice, too many are subjected to long wait times and bad practice - if they get through the front doors of the adoption agency at all.

"While some applicants will not be suitable to adopt, far too many people are not being given due consideration, and the delays that many experience are simply not good enough when we have thousands of children waiting to be adopted into homes where they can be helped to reach their full potential", he added.  

The survey also revealed that 13 percent of respondents were turned away on the grounds that their ethnicity did not match the ethnicity of the children in the agency's care.

The former chief executive of Barnardo's, Martin Narey, has warned that local authorities' "prejudice" against arranging mixed ethnicity adoptions was leading to a collapse in adoption rates.

Speaking to the Guardian Mr Narey said: "The law is very clear. A child should not stay in care for an undue length of time while waiting for adoptive parents of the same ethnicity.

"But the reality is that black, Asian and mixed race children wait three times longer than white children."

The Adoption and Children Act 2002, which came into force at the very end of 2005, sets out timescales to which agencies should adhere during the preparation, assessment and approval of adoptive parents.

The Act states that prospective adopters should be invited to an adoption information evening within two months of their initial inquiry. Of the survey's respondents, 69 percent were invited within three months of their inquiry but 31 percent waited three months or longer and 10 percent did not receive an invitation for longer than six months.

Mr Pearce said: "This research shows that those people coming forward to adopt are often met with poor and inconsistent service - an approach that will deter many prospective parents altogether.

"Furthermore, for two-thirds of our respondents it took less than one year for a child or sibling group to be placed but for one-third it took longer than one year. For 6 percent, it took longer than two years. This is far too long and means that there are children experiencing further trauma from staying in care too long or from moving between multiple foster placements," he added.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from