Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

DIVORCE:Kim v Morris [2012] EWHC 1103 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:31 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc1103
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 21, 2012, 10:35 AM
Article ID : 98825

(Family Division, Parker J, 2 May 2012)

In divorce proceedings in which the wife accused her husband of adultery, decree nisi had been pronounced in England 4 years ago. The husband subsequently issued divorce proceedings in Singapore where he now lived. The wife was now living in Hong Kong.

 The parties reconciled during the 4 years and so did not seek decree absolute but were now once again separated and sought to complete the divorce process. The Family Proceedings Rules 2010 were of crucial importance and the wife could not supplement her petition. In addition due to the age of the decree nisi followed by 4 years' reconciliation, the lack of jurisdictional connection with England and Wales, the new rules now in force and must be taken into account, to supplement her petition would be artificial, were it not for jurisdictional issues the wife would have issued the petition afresh. Decree nisi rescinded, petition dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from