Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

REMOVAL FROM JURISDICTION:Re A (Removal From Jurisdiction) [2012] EWCA Civ 1541

Sep 29, 2018, 18:30 PM
Slug : 2012ewcaciv1541
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 19, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100585

(Court of Appeal, Thorpe, Black LJJ, Sir David Keene, 22 June 2012) 

The Turkish mother applied for leave to remove the child and move to Turkey when the relationship with the English father ended. Permission was refused and the mother was prevented from taking the child to Turkey on holiday for a year. When the application was renewed it was once again refused. The mother appealed.

In dismissing the appeal the court held that it was for the judge to see and hear the witness evidence and there was no doubt that the maternal grandfather's evidence had caused the judge alarm. It was not for the Court of Appeal to minimise that consideration. The judge actively encouraged the mother to reapply for permission to take the child to Turkey on holiday when he was older.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from