Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

WELFARE: A London Borough v BB & Ors [2011] EWHC 2853 (Fam), [2012] COPLR 16

Sep 29, 2018, 21:31 PM
Slug : 2011ewhc2853fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 22, 2012, 02:45 AM
Article ID : 98839

(Family Division and Court of Protection, Ryder J, 31 August 2011)


The 32-year-old woman suffered from a schizo-effective disorder, a learning disability and was profoundly deaf. During a family holiday to Bangladesh the woman was married and the couple lived together in London for 4 years. The husband subsequently petitioned for divorce citing the woman's unreasonable behaviour.

Following an allegation that the woman had been assaulted by her mother she was removed from the family home and placed on a specialist psychiatric ward for the hearing impaired. Emergency steps were taken to deprive her of her liberty under Sch A1 to the 2005 Act. The woman was then moved to a residential placement and arrangements were made for her to have contact with her family.

It was common ground that the woman lacked capacity to litigate, to make decisions about her life including where she would live, who she would have contact with, who would provide her care. She furthermore lacked capacity at the time of her marriage and it was in her best interests to annul the marriage and make a forced marriage protection order.

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from