Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re P (Circumcision: Child in Care) [2021] EWHC 1616 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cobb J, 14 June 2021)Parental Responsibility – Circumcision – 21-month-old Muslim child – Raised in non-Muslim household of extended family – Mother sought...
R (Care Proceedings Joinder of Foster Carers) [2021] EWCA Civ 875
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Baker, Carr, Lewis LJJ, 15 June 2021)Practice and Procedure – Care proceedings – Foster carers joined as party to care proceedings – AppealThe...
The family court’s role in micro managing ‘trivial’ disputes
Sarah Higgins, Partner, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPThe decision in Re (B) (a child) (Unnecessary Private Law Applications) [2020] EWFC B44 dealt with the family court’s role in micro...
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
View all articles
Authors

CONTACT: Re W (Family Proceedings: Applications) [2011] EWHC 76 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:09 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC76
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 30, 2011, 09:37 AM
Article ID : 94321

(Family Division; Sir Nicholas Wall P; 1 February 2011)

The 12 and 10 year old girls had no direct contact with their father. Wall P banned the father from the county in which the girls lived save for specified purposes. The paternal grandparents sought direct contact with girls. The father did not appear at the hearing dealing with this application, with mother's application to commit father for contempt and with father's own appeal against various orders.

Where grandparents had a partisan attitude and were part of the fray rather than above it, it was appropriate to proceed with caution. A supervised contact visit would take place if the guardian still thought it in the children's interests and the court would then review it. The absence of a committal summons was a serious procedural defect but was not fatal where the father had been fully notified of the allegations and had abundant opportunity to meet them.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from