Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL ORDERS: S v AG (Financial Remedy: Lottery Prize) [2011] EWHC 2637 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:11 PM
Slug : 2011EWHC2637
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 8, 2011, 11:25 AM
Article ID : 97245

(Family Division; Mostyn J; 14 October 2011)

The wife won a share of a lottery prize worth £500,000. At issue was the treatment of such a prize in financial remedy proceedings following divorce. Distinction between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property. In this case the prize was received by the wife during marriage and not after de facto separation and most of the money was invested in the matrimonial property. The husband was ignorant of wife's participation in lottery.

Held that the winnings could be characterised as non-matrimonial property which were converted to matrimonial property to the extent that a home was purchased. However the non-matrimonial nature of the source of the monies should be reflected in the award. Judge identified £82,000 as what the husband needed on clean break basis. 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from