Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: Re J (Children's Objections) [2011] EWCA Civ 1448

Sep 29, 2018, 19:16 PM
Slug : 2011EWCACiv1448
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 7, 2011, 12:50 PM
Article ID : 97429

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Hallett LJJ, Sir Mark Potter; 2 December 2011)

Custody of three children aged 15, 13 and 10 was granted to father with contact with the mother.  The mother moved to UK and applied for variation of contact order to allow the children holidays in the UK. The mother failed to return the children and applied for their relocation to UK. The father made a Hague Convention application. The children and family reporter advised against joining the children as parties and found the children objected to a return to Poland. At the hearing the mother indicated that she would return to Poland if the children's return were ordered, which had not previously been her case.  Judge ordered return. Children instructed own solicitor and applied for leave to intervene and appeal. The mother also appealed.

The judge had erred in not following recent guidance by at least by not meeting with the children face to face to hear their objections and explain the purpose of a return order. Allowed the appeal and remitted the case for rehearing.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from