Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

CHILD/ POLICE PROTECTION: A (A Child) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2010] EWHC 1748 (Admin)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:30 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC1748
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 13, 2010, 10:43 AM
Article ID : 91295

(Family Division; Blake J; 16 July 2010)

The police forcibly removed a child from a fast food outlet late at night and informed the parents that although the child had not committed a crime and was not in trouble, the child had been seen with an ‘inappropriate adult'. The child was detained at the police station for about one-and-a-half hours then taken home. The child sought a judicial review of the detention. 

The issue was whether the police's action was authorised under the Children Act 1989, s 46 and whether the police were obliged to provide detailed reasons for decision or whether it was sufficient to provide broad outline of reasons.

The action was based on a constable having reasonable cause to believe that the child would otherwise be likely to suffer significant harm. It emerged that the police were concerned about a specific individual, and that the child and his companions without adult supervision were about to go back to the individual's home. The specific individual applied for a suppression of the detailed information.

The police had to justify its action and satisfy the court that what had honestly been feared was within the ambit of the statute, and was based upon reasonable grounds.The police sought to rely upon material of a private nature in public domain with potential adverse implications for the rights of the specific adult concerned.

The court could not compel the child to accept that information would be disclosed to his/her legal team but not to the child. The child agreed to this provided he/she was supplied with the gist of the police case. 


Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from