Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles

CHILD/ POLICE PROTECTION: A (A Child) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2010] EWHC 1748 (Admin)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:30 PM
Slug : 2010EWHC1748
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 13, 2010, 10:43 AM
Article ID : 91295

(Family Division; Blake J; 16 July 2010)

The police forcibly removed a child from a fast food outlet late at night and informed the parents that although the child had not committed a crime and was not in trouble, the child had been seen with an ‘inappropriate adult'. The child was detained at the police station for about one-and-a-half hours then taken home. The child sought a judicial review of the detention. 

The issue was whether the police's action was authorised under the Children Act 1989, s 46 and whether the police were obliged to provide detailed reasons for decision or whether it was sufficient to provide broad outline of reasons.

The action was based on a constable having reasonable cause to believe that the child would otherwise be likely to suffer significant harm. It emerged that the police were concerned about a specific individual, and that the child and his companions without adult supervision were about to go back to the individual's home. The specific individual applied for a suppression of the detailed information.

The police had to justify its action and satisfy the court that what had honestly been feared was within the ambit of the statute, and was based upon reasonable grounds.The police sought to rely upon material of a private nature in public domain with potential adverse implications for the rights of the specific adult concerned.

The court could not compel the child to accept that information would be disclosed to his/her legal team but not to the child. The child agreed to this provided he/she was supplied with the gist of the police case. 


Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from